“We are not persuaded by Graves’s claim that Wright’s exoneration in the Fourth Circuit was ‘premised upon a legal technicality.’ To be sure, Wright’s habeas claim succeeded because Graves should have recognized that grand larceny from the person was not a lesser-included offense of robbery,” Raphael wrote. “But the question here is whether Wright pleaded facts showing that he was actually innocent of grand larceny from the person. He did.”

Click Here To Read The Full Article