“In this court’s humble view, providing plaintiffs with a proverbial third ‘bite of the apple’ would be futile. A third jury trial would do nothing more than waste precious judicial resources while—in all likelihood—leaving the parties precisely where we began so many years ago,” U.S. District Judge Michael M. Baylson of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said following a second hung jury in an employment dispute against Uber.

Click Here To Read The Full Article